it Giro d'Italia
WorldTeam Men 08 May '26 - 31 May '26
11/21 Viareggio › Massa 42km
12/21 Porcari (Paper District) › Chiavari 195km
13/21 Imperia › Novi Ligure 175km
es Vuelta a Burgos Feminas
WorldTeam Women 21 May '26 - 24 May '26
1/4 Burgos › Burgos (Gamonal) 127km
2/4 Castrojeriz › Bodega Viña Pedrosa. Pedrosa de Duero 122km
3/4 Busto de Bureba › Medina de Pomar 126km
nl Veenendaal - Veenendaal WE
WorldTeam Women 22 May '26
1/1 Veenendaal › Veenendaal 120km
fr Paris - Troyes
Development Team 25 May '26
1/1 Colombey-les-Deux-Églises › Troyes 180km
be Antwerp Port Epic / Sels Trophy
WorldTeam Men 25 May '26
1/1
fr Alpes Isère Tour
Development Team 27 May '26 - 31 May '26
1/5 Charvieux-Chavagneux › Charvieux-Chavagneux 133km
2/5 Saint-Martin de Vaulserre › Bourgoin-Jallieu 134km
3/5 Arandon-Passins › Corbas 153km
fr Boucles de la Mayenne - Crédit Mutuel
WorldTeam Men 28 May '26 - 31 May '26
1/4 Laval (Espace Mayenne) › Laval (Espace Mayenne) 5km
2/4 Saint-Berthevin › Château-Gontier-sur-Mayenne 172km
3/4 Aron › Pré-en-Pail-Saint-Samson 215km
it Giro d'Italia Women
WorldTeam Women 30 May '26 - 07 Jun '26
1/9 Cesenatico › Ravenna 139km
2/9 Roncade H-Farm › Caorle 156km
3/9 Bibione › Buja 156km
Five Teams, Eight Riders Lodge CAS Appeal Over UCI Romandie Disqualification

Five Teams, Eight Riders Lodge CAS Appeal Over UCI Romandie Disqualification

Five women’s professional teams—Canyon//SRAM zondacrypto, EF Education - EasyPost, Lidl–Trek, Team Picnic PostNL, and Visma | Lease a Bike—and eight riders have lodged an appeal with the Court of Arbitration for Sport (CAS) against their disqualification from the Tour de Romandie Féminin in August.

In addition to the disqualifications, the UCI has referred the teams to its Disciplinary Commission and threatened to revoke their licences via the UCI Licence Commission.

The appeal asks CAS to review the UCI’s decision to expel five teams and disqualify 30 riders after a GPS tracker safety test. The UCI had mandated the use of an experimental device developed by its sponsor, Swiss Timing, in a professional race—without prior consultation or transparent communication.

The teams and riders had expressed willingness to cooperate with the test, requesting that the UCI mount the devices on the bike and appoint riders accordingly. When the UCI declined to do so, the teams and riders were subsequently disqualified.

The appellants argue that the collective disqualification violated UCI Regulations, was disproportionate, imposed without due process, and enforced in a manner that left riders and teams feeling intimidated.

Further details of the case and its timeline will be released in due course.

Related updates