it Giro d'Italia Next Gen
Development Team 14 Jun '26 - 21 Jun '26
3/8 Sibari › Villa d'Agri di Marsicovetere 166km
4/8 Matera › Corato (Molino Casillo) 152km
5/8 Bacoli › Bacoli 134km
ch Tour de Suisse Women
WorldTeam Women 17 Jun '26 - 21 Jun '26
1/5 Sondrio › Sondrio 109km
2/5 Locarno › Locarno 105km
3/5 Bad Ragaz › Bad Ragaz 120km
ch Tour de Suisse
WorldTeam Men 17 Jun '26 - 21 Jun '26
1/5 Sondrio › Sondrio 144km
2/5 Locarno › Locarno 157km
3/5 Bad Ragaz › Bad Ragaz 157km
fr La Route d'Occitanie - CIC
WorldTeam Men 18 Jun '26 - 20 Jun '26
1/3 Bram › Saint-Paul-Cap-de-Joux 171km
2/3 Cordes-sur-Ciel › Saint-Gaudens 200km
3/3 Loures-Barousse › Loudenvielle 172km
es Volta Ciclista a Catalunya Femenina
WorldTeam Women 19 Jun '26 - 21 Jun '26
1/3 Santa Susanna › Santa Susanna 92km
2/3 Sant Vicenç de Castellet › La Molina 130km
3/3 Mataró › Barcelona 110km
ad Andorra MoraBanc Clàssica
WorldTeam Men 21 Jun '26
1/1 Andorra la Vella › Coll de la Botella 125km
fr Tour de France
WorldTeam Men 04 Jul '26 - 26 Jul '26
1/21 Barcelona › Barcelona 19km
2/21 Tarragona › Barcelona 182km
3/21 Granollers › Les Angles 196km
be Grote Prijs CHW Beveren
WorldTeam Women 12 Jul '26
1/1
Five Teams, Eight Riders Lodge CAS Appeal Over UCI Romandie Disqualification

Five Teams, Eight Riders Lodge CAS Appeal Over UCI Romandie Disqualification

Five women’s professional teams—Canyon//SRAM zondacrypto, EF Education - EasyPost, Lidl–Trek, Team Picnic PostNL, and Visma | Lease a Bike—and eight riders have lodged an appeal with the Court of Arbitration for Sport (CAS) against their disqualification from the Tour de Romandie Féminin in August.

In addition to the disqualifications, the UCI has referred the teams to its Disciplinary Commission and threatened to revoke their licences via the UCI Licence Commission.

The appeal asks CAS to review the UCI’s decision to expel five teams and disqualify 30 riders after a GPS tracker safety test. The UCI had mandated the use of an experimental device developed by its sponsor, Swiss Timing, in a professional race—without prior consultation or transparent communication.

The teams and riders had expressed willingness to cooperate with the test, requesting that the UCI mount the devices on the bike and appoint riders accordingly. When the UCI declined to do so, the teams and riders were subsequently disqualified.

The appellants argue that the collective disqualification violated UCI Regulations, was disproportionate, imposed without due process, and enforced in a manner that left riders and teams feeling intimidated.

Further details of the case and its timeline will be released in due course.

Related updates